- 5%

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

Original price was: $1,214.95.Current price is: $1,149.99.

Added to wishlistRemoved from wishlist 0
Category: Tag:


Price: $1,214.95 - $1,149.99
(as of Jan 11, 2025 16:00:30 UTC – Details)


Canon EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras.What’s in the box: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Autofocus Lens, E-77U 77mm Snap-On Lens Cap,Lens Dust Cap E (Rear), ET-83C Lens Hood,Tripod Collar, LZ1324 Lens Case and 1-Year Warranty.
100-400mm telephoto zoom lens with f/4.5 maximum aperture for Canon SLR cameras
2 Image Stabilizer modes make it easy to capture far-off action or close-in portraits
Flourite and Super UD-glass elements largely eliminate secondary spectrum
Compatibility with extenders 1.4x II and 2x II; 5.9-foot close focusing distance
Measures 3.6 inches in diameter and 7.4 inches long; 1-year warranty

Customers say

Customers praise the camera lens for its quality, pictures, and value for money. They find it a good portrait lens that produces stunning images and clear macro shots. Many consider it an affordable quality Canon Zoom lens worth keeping. While some are satisfied with the sharpness and performance, others mention it’s somewhat heavy. There are mixed opinions on speed and zoom range.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

7 reviews for Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

0.0 out of 5
0
0
0
0
0
Write a review
Show all Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
  1. A. Lundwall

    A great lens, wish I’d bought it a long time ago!
    I bought this lens about a week ago. I’ve taken about 1000 pictures with it since, including a trip to the Dallas zoo. I’ve been pouring over the pictures, and I’m impressed with how well this lens works.I also have the Sigma 150-500 f/5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM lens, so much of what I mention here will be as a direct result of comparing the two lenses.First, the thing that I like most about the Canon 100-400L is that you can use it wide open. Sure, it sharpens a little bit if you stop it down, as do all zooms. But it doesn’t change that much! My Sigma, for instance, at 500mm, f/6.3, is too soft by far! If you stop down to f/9, it’s usually acceptable, but I wouldn’t say it’s “sharp” until f/11. At shorter focal lengths, it isn’t this bad…at 400mm, you can get some pretty decent shots at f/8, but even then, it continues to improve until f/11, f/13…. My new Canon, on the other hand, is 100% acceptable at 400mm/f5.6. It gets a bit sharper by f/7, but it’s not a big difference. And the differences are small enough past that aperture that it’s hard to say there’s an improvement at all. The bottom line for me is that there’s much less chance of me missing a shot because I forgot to step down two stops…or because I couldn’t open wide enough to get enough exposure!It’s also almost 2″ shorter, and almost an inch smaller in diameter, than the Sigma. Lengthwise, it’s about the same as a 70-200 f2.8, and weighs just a tad more. So, if you can fit a 70-200 f/2.8 in your bag, you can probably fit this. I carry this lens mounted on the camera using a Black Rapid strap attached to the tripod collar. Carried this way, you forget you have a 400mm zoom lens attached…or maybe I’m just used to the Sigma (which is longer, and weighs a pound more). At any rate, it’s not a small lens, but it’s not unmanageable.The auto focus is noticeably faster than my Sigma, and worked well. Out of 500 pictures taken at the zoo, there were maybe 20 that I’d say weren’t in focus, and some of them were due to me not having a fast enough shutter speed, in spite of the Image Stabilization.And speaking of IS, it works pretty good on this lens, even thought it’s only good for about 2 f-stops. Remember, this lens design is over 10 years old…and back then, 2 stops was state of the art in IS! This is one area where the Sigma beats the Canon..the sigma has a better IS (though Sigma calls it OS). But really, if you’re spending this kind of money on a 100-400mm zoom, you probably have already realized that IS isn’t going to save you from bad technique, or stop your moving subject!I have used it with a Kenko Pro300 1.4x Teleplus teleconverter. I can’t say there’s no loss in sharpness, because of course there is. But it’s still usable…here, it DOES pay to stop down a bit. The autofocus still works with the TC on my 5Dm3, though it’s a bit slower.Some folks hate the push-pull zoom mechanism, but not me! I love it! It’s fast, and easier for me to adjust to a moving target. The only downside is that there’s no lock! If you carry it without tightening the tension ring, the lens will extend on its own. You can tighten the tension ring so that this doesn’t happen, of course, but working the tension ring is a two handed job. In fact, that’s my only real gripe about the lens…I can’t go from locked (or more accurately, tight) to loose one-handed. But, I’ll live with this because I like the lens so much in other ways.It comes with a case, a hood, and a tripod collar. It should…it cost enough. The case is pretty nice, and the tripod collar is first rate! The hood is OK…but for some reason seems kinda ‘plastic-y’, although in typical Canon fashion, it does have the non-reflective suede on the inside.In this focal length range, you really only have two choices, for a zoom lens…this lens and the Sigma. You can get good results with the Sigma, certainly! But better results, and with less effort, are the norm for this lens.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  2. Christian P. Wade

    Primarily used for Plane Spotting (aviation photography)
    I did much research before committing to this particular lens. I considered the EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS USM, the EF 70-200 f/2.8L II IS USM, and the 1.4 and 2x Extenders for use with either of those listed lenses. After much reading, I decided to spend my money on this for the following reasons:-I want the most versatility while carrying the least amount of lenses.-I am not concerned about carrying large and heavy lens/camera combinations. Thanks USMC.-I take photos of aircraft at airports and in overhead flight.-I wanted to avoid using Extenders (see next comment).-I would use an Extender on the EF 70-200 f/2.8L (and the II) IS USM but that’s much more expensive.Pros:-I actually love the telescoping characteristic of the zoom function of this lens. I got used to it quickly and have learned to appreciate how quickly I can capture aircraft traveling at me, past me, or away from me. Keep track of the tension ring to ensure you don’t upset stability of hold while on burst settings. I have used this lens many times and have yet to experience the “dust pump” phenomenon that many have written about. I think this urban legend may be anecdotal nonsense.-Lens comes complete with hood, lens cap, rear cap, and quality storage case (don’t purchase those separately).-Tripod ring included and it can be loosened and rotated to 12 o’clock for when in the hand-held mode for ease of carry.-I’ve found that WITH GOOD LIGHTING, I obtain excellent photos on f/8, ISO 100, ~+.25-.5 Exp. Comp., and with a shutter speed appropriate for the speed of aircraft.-Autofocus is pretty fast…not as fast as my EF 70-200 f/4L USM, but fast enough. Hunts every once in a while, but this hasn’t been a problem. Out of thousands of shots, I’ve only lost a couple due to AF hunting (in the sets of rapid fire shots).-Doesn’t cost as much as an EF 70-200 f/2.8L II IS USM; especially when one adds the cost of an Extender (and then deals with the associated loss of aperture stops, albeit minimal with the aforementioned world class lens).-Makes me look like I know what I’m doing. For those who [really] know what they’re doing, after reading this, you know that I’m a newbie. Oh, and airport security can see that I am just a harmless plane spotter from a long ways off since the lens is off-white and HUGE and they leave me alone.Cons:-Expensive no matter how one slices that. (Not really a con, per se, for me).-Needs well planned and continuously worked lighting to support crisp shots.-Not as precise at 400mm than say, at 350mm (but that’s probably just the way it goes).-Can be tricky when using an Extender in the mix. Frankly, though, I haven’t yet found a situation with the lens, as it is, that really finds me needing an Extender anyway. That’s why I bought the 400mm in the first place.-In tight plane spotting situations (i.e. Gravelly Point Park at Reagan National…where the airplanes are literally feet above you) 100mm is just too much zoom and one looses shot opportunities on close aircraft. So that’s why I kept my trusty EF 70-200 f/4L USM and carry it with me in the bag. Again, I’m not worried about the weight.Would I recommend this lens to someone else? Absolutely. If you want 300-400mm capability (on top of ~100-300), then you’re pretty much stuck with this choice. Great glass (it’s an “L”) and solid build. Don’t be frightened away by the myth of the “dust pump”. Perhaps that might be a problem if you live in Afghanistan, but it’s not been a problem whatsoever for me. I’ve grown to love the sliding zoom feature and have figured out the tension ring to ensure I don’t have to pull too hard to get adjustment while I have the shutter release depressed for a series of shots.If you’re a plane spotter and find yourself in situations with pesky air traffic controllers who like to play tricks on you, then you better get this lens. It is the only one I’ve found that can do the relatively close shots well and gives you that 300-400mm for those shots you wouldn’t otherwise attempt. LOVE THIS LENS.I have also purchased a B&W 77mm UV haze filter (that works great) and a 77mm circular polarizer to enhance aircraft/sky contrast since many aircraft are painted white/gray/or light blue.Now fork over the cash and get some great photos with this lens (and be sure to learn all those crazy functions on your Manual setting and forget about automatic modes).

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  3. Mark Dollery

    I love it. In combination with a Canon 5d classic and 7d Mk1 it’s a dream. As long as you work within it’s limitations.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  4. M. B. BERTRAND

    Très bon zoom. C’est l’ancien modèle à pompe, acheté d’occasion et totalement révisé en Angleterre.Pèse son poids, mais c’est la rançon d’une qualité irréprochable.Sa focale de 100 à 400mm laisse une plage d’utilisation conséquente et la qualité est présente à tous les étages.Très bonne ouverture parfaitement opérante, même en conditions de nuit. Et, même en très longue focale, un excellent piqué. Toutes les photos d’illustration ont été prises à 400mm et sans aucun problème, les deux de jour à main levée, les deux autres sur pied.Il vient remplacer très avantageusement mon ancien Canon 75-300mm 1:4-5,6 III USM et complètera à merveille mon Canon 28-135mm 1;3,5-5,6 IS USM.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  5. mizzu

    prodotto integro

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  6. Frank

    Always been a great lens

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  7. Torios

    Grundsätzlich wirklich gut und keinerlei Mängel. Nur der Objektivdeckel fehlt, deshalb einen Stern Abzug.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this

    Add a review

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras
    Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is USM Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

    Original price was: $1,214.95.Current price is: $1,149.99.

    Best Deals for all new
    Logo
    Shopping cart